A little context on "heavily armed Israeli forces" protecting Jews

Egypt's Rosa el-Youssef newspaper writes:

On Wednesday evening, the Zionist occupation forces transformed the city of Jerusalem into a military barracks, coinciding with the launch of settler marches to celebrate "Sukkot," which is organized annually by extremist religious groups in the occupied city of Jerusalem in a provocative way for the Palestinian citizens of the land.

We see similar language all the time when Arab media discusses Jews visiting the Temple Mount "under the protection of heavily armed Israeli police."

And why does Israel have to take such extreme measures to protect their citizens?

Because Palestinian terror leaders have been threatening every Jew in Jerusalem with "armed resistance"!

Let's zoom out a little more:

During Oslo, the PLO signed agreements that Jews would have free access to their holy places.

Then, in 2000, they stopped all Jews from going to the Temple Mount, breaking their agreement.

A few years later, Israel decided that Jews actually have religious rights on their holiest spot, and allowed Jews to visit with heavy protection.

Similarly, Joseph's Tomb in Nablus should have been freely open to Jews under Oslo, and visitors should be protected by Palestinian police. Instead, Israel is forced to protect pilgrims using armored buses and lots of soldiers. 

And the Palestinians complain about how heavy the security presence is.

A little context explains a lot. 

---

---

Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon! Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.  Read all about it here!