Monday, November 22, 2021
2:04 PM
Elder of Ziyon
No comments
This statement was interpreted as a rebuke to Israel for declaring six organizations as terrorist.
But there is more to this story.
According to an anonymous State Department official, Thomas-Greenfield did not plan to meet with any of the NGOs Israel says are linked to terror, as reported by Al Quds Al-Arabi. As a result, 70 Palestinian NGOs boycotted Thomas-Greenfield and said they would refuse to meet with her, calling any such meetings "normalization."
That means that if Thomas-Greenfield did meet with anyone, she has to keep it a secret - because the same Palestinian "human rights" community that she extolled would be most unhappy with anyone who felt it was important to speak to the US.
As we've seen with Arab boycotts since at least the 1930s, when anyone defies them, the consequences are not pretty.
So we have a huge irony where Linda Thomas-Greenfield is praising organizations that are either threatening other NGOs for not toeing the Palestinian line of hate, or those who cannot work freely in the oppressive environment that Palestinian civil society has created.
Most of her tweets from her trip to the region include photos. Not this one. A photo would endanger people.
In short, she has proven that there is no freedom of expression in the Palestinian territories, and the US is forced to hide who it is talking to to protect them from Palestinian "human rights" activists.
That's pretty messed up. And it shows that the entire "human rights" edifice in the Palestinian-ruled areas is against basic human rights.
Related Posts:
The UN is consistent (cartoon)I tweeted this cartoon on Friday, changing the caption from the original WWI-era version to one that seems highly appropriate today. I didn't caption the pile of bodies "Syria" which would be highly appropriate, as it is c… Read More
12/24 Links: Trump on UN Anti-Israel Vote: 'Things Will Be Different After Jan. 20'; Five Ways Trump Could Avenge the Anti-Israel UN VoteFrom Ian: Obama’s Betrayal Today’s resolution brands the Jewish presence in any part of the West Bank or in parts of Jerusalem that were occupied by Jordan from 1949 to 1967 as illegal. And it makes the hundreds of thousands… Read More
The difference between anti-Israel Republicans and anti-Israel Democrats (posters)I am finding that my anger at the betrayal of Israel by the world is easier expressed through graphics than essays. (Baker's widely disseminated quote, usually cited as "they didn't vote for us," was never verified, but … Read More
The "status quo" of 60 years ago: "Old Jerusalem like a dead city" (1956 NYT) "Jews not allowed" (1955)This is the status quo that the world wants to return Jerusalem to. Here were Jordan's rules for tourists reported in the NYT in May 1955: This is what the UN is trying to do, today. We have lots of ideas, but w… Read More
The 1994 Israel-Jordan peace agreement shows that the UN resolution is based on fantasy, not lawThe anti-Israel UN resolution passed on Friday refers to the "1967 lines" a number of times: Condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied s… Read More
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)