Donate Us

Help us keep this free site alive with a small contribution from you. Select an amount below.

Monday, November 7, 2016


A guest post from Irene:


If you don’t understand what the question is, your answer will be wrong.

The question is not “Why are we celebrating the centenary of the Balfour Declaration?”  The question is, “What gave the British the right to give land that was not theirs to people who did not live there, ignoring the wishes of indigenous people?”

That’s the question the average person will have after reading almost any one of the recently numerous articles extolling the Balfour Declaration (and more will follow in the coming year), including most of those written by persons friendly to Israel.  And it’s exactly the question that Arabs want people to ask, knowing that it leads the average person to conclude that Israel has no right to exist. 

The Arabs use the Balfour Declaration as a potent weapon against Israel.  Balfour conjures up images of the world’s foremost colonial power using force to impose its will on lands thousands of miles away with arrogant disregard of the native peoples.  It is an image so vivid, so powerful, that it burns its way through the minds of the uninformed with lasting effect. 

That is why I recommend that writers defuse the weapon by immediately putting the Balfour Declaration in perspective as an historically interesting letter that was almost immediately superseded by international law.  I would dismiss Balfour in five sentences or less.  That is all it deserves.  If you spend any more time on it, you are playing into Arab hands.

All of the emphasis of articles should be on the international law that followed Balfour and that formed the basis for Israel—the decisions of the winning powers (not just the British) at San Remo and the unanimous decision of the 51 members of the League of Nations to issue the Mandate for Palestine.  The League issued the Mandate pursuant to Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, which provided a path towards statehood for peoples previously under Ottoman rule who were not immediately able to stand up a nation of their own.  Although it does not use these specific words, the Mandate in effect recognized the Jews as an indigenous people with aboriginal rights.

Emphasis should also be given to the fact that the decisions regarding Palestine were made at the same time that decisions were made to carve five Arabs nations out of the carcass of Ottoman Turkey’s Empire and mirrored decisions redrawing boundaries and changing sovereignties in Europe, Africa, and the Pacific at the end of World War I.

Some people may quibble with my statement that Balfour was “superseded by international law” because both the San Remo decision and the Balfour Declaration refer to it and quote from it.  Balfour was a very short and very vague document.  The Mandate for Palestine is a long and detailed document that provides for encouragement of Jewish immigration and close settlement on the land.  It specifies a Jewish governmental body (but no Arab governmental body) with which the British would interact during the period of the Mandate and which would be the basis for the new state.  It addresses a long list of other concerns, for example, access to holy places.  So I stand by my statement.  A few vague sentences issued by the British were supplanted by a detailed international law adopted unanimously by the League of Nations.

The answer to the question of “What gave the British the right to give land..." is that the British did not give away any land.  The disposition of conquered lands at the end of World War I was addressed by international laws that recognized five Arab nations and a single small Jewish nation in the Ottoman Middle East.  Few nations on earth have such a nice pedigree in international law as does Israel.

If you are a writing a scholarly paper, then yeah, spend a lot of time on Balfour.  It was an interesting document.  But it you are writing for the popular press, be aware that your words go out to people who already think Israel is illegitimate and are looking for memes to prove it.  The Balfour Declaration, issued by a colonial power about a faraway land, is the perfect meme for that purpose.  These people will not reach paragraph 18 of your article, when you finally get around to mentioning the Mandate.




We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

EoZTV Podcast

Powered by Blogger.

follow me

search eoz

Recent posts from other blogs

subscribe via email

comments

Contact

translate

E-Book

source materials

reference sites

multimedia

source materials for Jewish learning

great places to give money

media watch

humor

.

Source materials

Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts Ever

follow me

Followers


pages

Random Posts

Pages - Menu

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون

Donate!

Tweets

Compliments

Monthly subscription:
Subscription options

One time donation:

Interesting Blogs

Categories

Best posts of 2016

Blog Archive

compliments

Algemeiner: "Fiercely intelligent and erudite"

Omri: "Elder is one of the best established and most respected members of the jblogosphere..."
Atheist Jew:"Elder of Ziyon probably had the greatest impression on me..."
Soccer Dad: "He undertakes the important task of making sure that his readers learn from history."
AbbaGav: "A truly exceptional blog..."
Judeopundit: "[A] venerable blog-pioneer and beloved patriarchal figure...his blog is indispensable."
Oleh Musings: "The most comprehensive Zionist blog I have seen."
Carl in Jerusalem: "...probably the most under-recognized blog in the JBlogsphere as far as I am concerned."
Aussie Dave: "King of the auto-translation."
The Israel Situation:The Elder manages to write so many great, investigative posts that I am often looking to him for important news on the PalArab (his term for Palestinian Arab) side of things."
Tikun Olam: "Either you are carelessly ignorant or a willful liar and distorter of the truth. Either way, it makes you one mean SOB."
Mondoweiss commenter: "For virulent pro-Zionism (and plain straightforward lies of course) there is nothing much to beat it."
Didi Remez: "Leading wingnut"